This writer is confident that neither Rodham-Clinton nor Obama will be elected to the Presidency. The nation may be somewhat stupefied by the ethnic, Bush Bashing and sexual diversity that Democrats love to espouse and foster, but most Americans have their heads on straight and know when it’s time to weigh in, put their feet down and call a halt to national suicidal tendencies. A case in point: they know that Hillary Clinton is vicious, and voters know that vicious streak is domestically and internationally dangerous. Anyone who believes they own the body politic and the voters as the Clintons do is one to watch like a hawk.
Obama may be as smooth as silk but without an ounce of management, national security, financial management, and international relations experience he is nothing more than an empty suit. One does not have to think long before it should become abundantly obvious that despite his ability to think and speak on his feet, he is only as deep as the script he was fed before the last appearance. Think for a moment, how about Obama’s “10,000 died during the destruction of Greensburg, Kansas?” By the way, where’s the media mockery? If GW made that gaffe, the media and Democrats would be having a heyday. All this translates into “Presidential Handlers.” i.e. Obama would be a puppet of the left; well, on second thought, he’s out there pretty far all on his own.
Obama’s reputation rests on the fact that he opposed the US invasion of Iraq. That raises the question of, “Why?” No, let’s not have stock Democrat talking points, which like all lies may or may not contain an element of truth. Was Obama’s motivation ethnic and religious? Was he a covert Hussein sympathizer? Supporting Obama might be titillating to liberals, Democrats and the media (darn-it, another "tri-dundancy") to embrace the notion of a President with a mid-eastern, Muslim name, but mainstream America still has nightmares, and should, of airliners piloted by Muslims flying into American iconic landmarks.
Despite the whackos, nut cakes and weirdoes who invent, perpetrate, foster and disseminate conspiracy theories, GW Bush did not have anything to do with the 911 attacks anymore so than FDR had to do with the attacks on Oahu. Where was Mr. Tenet? What was that leftover of the Clinton Administration doing in the lead-up to the Muslim attacks? What did he know, and when? What in the world was GW thinking when he kept Tenet as Director of the CIA? And, where is the Democrat controlled Congress’ grandstanding investigation?
Whereas “GW and Company” made their share of mistakes, and in retrospect showed appalling ignorance, lack of any depth of understanding and insight into the Arab Muslim mind and the historical (for those “historians” in the “crowd”) setting, it was Bill Clinton who beforehand had time and resources nip Osama bin laden’s fantasies at the bud.
Osama did not suddenly appear the day after Inauguration Day, 2001. But if one listens to and believes, despite abundant evidence to the contrary, Democrats and their propaganda arm, the mainstream media, one might actually conclude that the entire matter arose during the Bush Administration.
When one makes statements and engages in political behavior that lends aid and comfort to America’s enemies as illustrated by that enemy’s public pronouncements and behavior, is not the former treason? Liberals, Dems and RINOs, think real hard now! What group of individuals has been doing the above with vigor?
Copyright © May 11h, 2007, by Robert L. Pappas. With proper attribution, this essay may be quoted and redistributed. It may not be used in any way, in conjunction with any advertisement without the author’s expressed written permission.