by Colonel Bob Pappas, USMC, Retired
It’s doubtful, but some may know Gloria Allred. Allred, a “Femi-Nazi” attorney who like “righteous brothers” Sharpton and Jackson chasing racial issues, chases female gender issues with the same passion, albeit hardly as pure as a Southern Baptist preacher seeking lost souls. Following her self-serving, grandstanding contribution to the successful destruction of Herman Cain’s Presidential candidacy (the left couldn’t have a black man running against a mulatto), her income stream was evidently down. So, when Rush Limbaugh correctly made reference to a 30 year old law student as a slut and prostitute, Ms. Allred in full pharisaical, self righteous, hypocritical, “Femi-Thumping” grandeur has now called for prosecution of Mr. Limbaugh.
The left has been squealing like a truckload of stuck pigs at Limbaugh’s “outrageous” comments. But when it was the left maligning, no, “slutifying” Congresswoman Michelle Bachman, Governor Sarah Palin, or Governor Brewer and others, their collective silence was deafening! “Ambulance chaser” Allred has about as much integrity in honest debate as a bucket of warm spit has ability to quench an NFL player’s thirst. The challenge that confronts Americans is that most of the media including some at “Fair and Balanced” FOX News buy into the nonsense.
At the Congressional panel before which Ms. Fluke presented her testimony, she effectively admitted to engaging in sexual conduct whose cost for contraception over a three year period was $3000.00. Assuming the cost per episode was two dollars, $3000.00 would support1500 episodes or a once per day activity.
The definition of “slut” from a number of dictionaries is to the effect: “I`n general, a woman who is sexually promiscuous, or a prostitute.” (The distinction between slut and prostitute being that the latter receives compensation.) Ms. Fluke volunteered to testify as an expert witness, a status that was evidently supported by personal experience at the $3000.00, three year level; and which substantiates Mr. Limbaugh’s characterization. The left’s outrage against Limbaugh arises from the fact that he lowered himself by his own admission, shame on him, to the level of typical leftist vitriol. Evidently, the left reserves the right to use that sort of language to itself.
The Congressional Hearing was intended to showcase “women’s rights” versus Catholic Church doctrine and to blunt criticism of the Obama Administration’s direction that self-insured employers and insurance companies provide “free” contraceptives. The “itty bitty” problem is that the use of contraceptives is a violation of Catholic teaching, and as an employer and self-insured entity the Church would be required by the Obama Administration to violate its teachings, in violation of the 1st Amendment; nothing new here. It is outrageous that the Congress has not initiated impeachment proceedings! What the hell did we elect them to do if not uphold and defend the Constitution. Yes, I know, it’s about their careers, not the American people! We have one such careerist in Northwest Florida, so we know careerism well.
Next, Churches will be required to hire female and homosexuals priests because Obama’s Department of Labor will issue regulations that prohibit “workplace” discrimination. Then the Food and Drug Administration will prohibit the Church from administering the Eucharist because consumption of the “host” violates food purity standards of Title 21 U.S. Code. Far fetched? Not with Obama in office. Tell me again O’Reilly, “he’s just inexperienced, he doesn’t know what he is doing.”
Sounding much like the recent stewardess-gone-amuck on an American Airlines flight, Femi-Nazi “talking heads” screech that a significant percent of Catholic women use contraceptives. So? No doubt Catholic Church leaders are shaking in their boots at “talking heads” and The View’s outrage.
Obama promised to totally change America and this as one more way he is attempting to change it. However, he will lose. Catholic women, even those who do not agree with the contraception doctrine will vote against him for his not-so-veiled intervention in Church doctrine.
Copyright © March 11th, 2012 by Robert L. Pappas. With proper attribution, this essay may be quoted and redistributed. It may not be used in any way, in conjunction with any advertisement without the author's expressed written permission.