Gulf1 - C - From the Gunny's Desk

Acting for the Future

by Gunner Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired

For all who have followed my writings, there can be no question of where I stand on the issue of the status of the qualifications of the man serving as president, and the issues of the paperwork which he has supplied, only after the fact, only after being challenged as legitimate for the office.

I had written a column for this week, but the release of information in a press conference with the Western Journalism Center, presented by several members of the Arizona Legislature, Sheriff Arpaio, several members of his assembled “cold case posse” who were principle in the investigation of the presented papers, and have made statements and answered direct questions from those at the press conference, has led me to write in comment on the facts as presented regarding this issue.

At this point, we have the Arizona Governor stating she “believes” obama/sotero is true and honestly elected, and is qualified for the office he sits in.  We have heard the Governor of Hawaii state “belief” in this man’s qualifications, and in fact, that he was born in that state.

I have personally received several letters from each of my two senators, Senator Burr, and Senator Hagan, both who state unequivocally, they “believe” the president has met the requirements and is qualified.  My district representative, Congressman Jones, has stated he “believes” the president is legitimate, and qualified, and he will not question it.  I believe in God, the government does not accept “belief” as official evidence of qualification, but requires it’s own legal documents.

For some, this has been sufficient, and not only sufficient to accept an unknown man as president, but sufficient for them to charge those who do question this, with being stupid, being “conspiracy theorists”, or pursuing this issue for racial purposes, and thereby accusing me, and all who stand with me, of being racist.  We have been accused of pursuing this issue for political purpose, and for practically every evil reason that one could come up with.  With all that before me, I must first say, I am a professional.  I am a professional Marine; I spend two decades of my life in defense of my Nation, living under an Oath which is binding to my death.

I know with no room for doubt, as a professional document examiner, the two proffered short form birth certificates are forgeries, because I can see on my computer screen, the signs of tampering with the “would be” documents, which are not on actual blank documents which are filled out, but appear only when a filled out document is used by removing the data, and other data inserted. 

I have been trained to examine Birth Verification documents as a recruiter by the Marine Corps, and a part of that training was the bringing in of document experts, contracted to the School, for the purpose of teaching us how to identify a true document, and how to eliminate false ones, in the course of our duties.

Great effort is made to make the fundamental documents that demark “Citizens” practically impossible to forge, and while not impossible, it is practically impossible without having access to the fundamental elements of the documents themselves, in this case, the legal form of birth known as The Birth Verification Document.

The form is made of a unique paper, one which could be duplicated, but not without extraordinary machinery and equipment equal to that which is used by the actual manufacturer.  That paper is of proprietary material, part wood product, part linen, part cotton, and the blend is unique to this document.

Upon this paper, the actual form is printed, and in doing so, both ink is permanently transferred into the paper, the ink soaking into the mesh of cotton, linen and wood fiber, and at the same time, embossing the paper, compressing it with the lines, words, and figures which make up the outline of the form, and the defining of each space and what should be inserted.  Even if it were possible to remove the ink of the printing, perfectly, the printing would remain, as embossed, compressed where ever a line, a letter a word, or a symbol was printed, and is immediately visible with proper lighting.

The form which was presented as “the long form”, only after Mr. Trump suggested it was necessary to see, or his own fame would fan the flames of challenge, has been shown not to be the official blank form, filled in, but a piece of ordinary paper of similar weight and thickness, with the “form” printed on it by a copy machine, and not by the means the forms are made.

The many anomalies in the various sizes and forms of print which are presented have been shown, and are far too numerous for me to go into detail, and they too demonstrate they were not typed, but printed by a modern machine, on the paper.  The race of the father is listed as “African”, which was not used on government forms at the time, the legal term being negro, and government documents do not allow personal preference, as has been suggested.

The demonstration of this document shows that the “security feature printing” of the paper was actually the last part applied in the making of this paper forgery of a document, and as such, it has been amply proven what was presented was a copy machine generated piece of paper, and not an original document, as was stated.  The forging of Federal Legal Documents is a Federal Felony.  That such a thing was done to provide a means of attaining an office illegally must violate other laws as well but no investigation has been made prior to this one.

The second piece to be examined was the proffered draft registration notice.  It is sent out by the government draft board, and when a person receives theirs, they fill it out, sign it, and take it to the post office, where it is date stamped, and signed by the Postal Clerk, and sent in.

The first thing one sees, looking at the one proffered by obama/sotero, is the fact the common round date stamp, what one sees on forms and official documents which go through the post office routinely, has only two digits for the year.  Some seventeen other draft registration notices were obtained by the Sheriff’s Posse via the FOIA, including two from the same post office within days of the date of the proffered item one before and the other after, and each of them, all, have the four digit 1980 properly centered in the circle surrounding, with all the data of the stamp in proper place relative to each other.  Each of the forms exactly match the others, except the one in question.

The Sheriff has sent a the draft registration notice to the federal draft board, requesting a statement from them and their experts, but the facts have been demonstrated, it is in truth, more a courtesy than anything else, and is, in this writer’s opinion, a slap in the face that the draft board would overlook this known fact, the notice having been public, and obvious in its deviation, and no one has yet been willing to question any part of the voluminous stacked evidence.

For me, the most egregious part of this whole issue has been the utter lack of support for any of the hundreds of thousands of Sovereign Citizens who have seen the issues themselves, and asked those who are supposed to represent them directly, and the abject refusal to even allow the question.

This Nation was “constituted” under The Rule of Law, by the Consent of The Sovereign Citizens, and its whole authority was derived from “the consent of the governed”.  Our  decision regarding how we will allow this to play out will determine if we remain “sovereign” in any way, and by that, whether we retain rights, natural, self evident under reason, or if we allow the politicians to define us as subjects, as they have in all response to this issue.

 

Copyright March 2012 by Gulf1

Who Will Do Something

by Gunnery Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired

I guess I understand why Dr. Paul is being literally shunned by most everyone who has anything to do with the pre-game show, but I’ve got to ask, who is going to do something, and what are they going to do?

We’ve had a bill passed “that had to be passed so we could find out what’s inside it.  We’ve had the exact same game played in the last government caused market collapse, but this time with an amount equal to all the debt ever held by our Nation.

We’ve seen the obama-care bill turned out laden with extras, while the accounting of it was turned inside out, so taxes would be paying for it long before benefits Accountable to it will be disbursed.  Because of this, we now are told by the Congressional Budget Office the ultimate cost won’t be the nine hundred billion, but more like one point seven trillion, and they have a long history of underestimating costs.

While this is happening, congress is voting on obama’s proposal to increase the cost of medical care for our members of the Armed Forces substantially, medical care for injuries suffered in the line of duty.  People are watching their medical costs go up every month, substantially, and we are not even seeing obamacare, just the “re-adjustments in manner and means of payments”, part and parcel to making the price tag look smaller.

We have watched as the government which once was ours, has deliberately shut down industries, gone to great lengths to shut down jobs while slamming a door in one our closest, most reliable ally’s face, in denying the gas pipeline.  This being done while substantial coal mining operations have been shut down, oil drilling is halted, and our president is set to give away United States, or more accurately, Alaska’s and United States territory to Russia, including substantial oil and vast mineral rights, with no return.

The man in the president’s seat has decided he can determine when The Senate is in or out of session, and when recess appointments can be made.  He and his cabinet have stated he needs no authorization from congress to go to war, but can and will take guidance and direction from the United Nations or other international bodies.

Our Supreme Court has members who consider foreign law as better suited study material when deciding cases and case law, over our Constitution and our own long history of jurisprudence.  While at the same time, one of the Justices was a primary actor in the assembly of obamacare, yet refuses to recuse herself from the case of the constitutionality of obamacare.

We have been told our Constitution is out dated, no longer is applicable to the law or for the purpose of “constituting a government”.  Every possible excuse has been made for the utter failure of any constituted part of our government to actually do and complete its job, and yet we are told we must simply give them more time.

At what point will we decide the problem is it isn’t our government, they don’t work for us.  Their purpose is not to secure our rights, but to steal them.  They have no purpose in limiting their waste, but see no reason to spend into two generations into the future.

So how many are going to the polls this November with the intent to remove every incumbent?  Who is going to vote on Election Day for a president who will do what has never been done since the Federal Reserve was illegally put into being?  What steps are we all going to take to see our Nation closer to being back in our hands?

I have to ask, because it is becoming all too apparent, we are either afraid of the risk of taking a swing at hitting it out of the park, because that is what it will take to win the game, or we’ve decided to accept the loss for what ever each of our personal reasons may be.

When I ask why, the constant and continual response is with regard to the ability to beat the incumbent.  If we can’t beat this president by deciding to stand up, take and put all our effort into fixing our very real, very tough problems, what makes anyone think another mainstream candidate is going to walk away the winner?

I’ve really got to wonder, if we can only afford to get the slightest distance away from status quo, just exactly when do we think we’re going to even begin to fix things?  Does anyone believe obamacare is going away without it being thrown out wholesale, on the basis of being totally and completely unconstitutional?

 

Copyright March 2012 by Gulf1

Choosing Our Government

by Gunnery Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired

As I look forward to the coming election cycle, I am not very optimistic.  We have the greatest leap forward in our Nation’s history towards totally and completely altering our form, and the progressive side of the electorate is ecstatic over this change.  At the same time, the conservative side seems to have chosen to trust in “the system”, the party system, once a “guide” as to what candidates stood for, now a commission which determines who may be the candidate, and I am left wondering where our “rugged individualism” is, where our willingness to take risks, rise to challenges, and why we haven’t chosen to confront the definitively criminal changes made, but decided we’d just go along with the party and select someone “electable”.

Last week, the editor of a conservative journal suggested one of the remaining candidates on the podium assume the stance and principles of Ron Paul, because the editor suggests we can’t do anything to stay the progression of our Nation to the left without taking radical and immediate measures, doing things to end the debt, taking measures to reduce the budget next year by a trillion dollars, by not allowing the debt ceiling to rise, and forcing government to operate under revenue generated.

His stance is based on the idea one of the other candidates can beat the illegal incumbent, but only the Constitutionalist has the ideas which are necessary to save our Nation.  I have to wonder how someone who has lived in the ideals of “constitutionalism” for more than forty years and has provided a rational plan for ending our deficit spending, paying off our debt, and restoring the rule of law over government, can have all these great ideas, yet someone else, someone without those ideas, and someone who does not have them etched on their heart and soul, could possibly be more passionate, more enthusiastic, and more effective in selling these revolutionary ideas better than the man who lives them each and every day.

At the same time, the news reports the implementation of obamacare is actually going to cost “almost twice” the estimate made originally by the Congressional Budget Office, based on the information they were given.  It seems some of the expenses were left of the sheet, and the collecting of taxes to pay for it would start two to three years before the actual implementation of it, so we will be paying taxes on it for some three years of no benefits, while the cost was figured on the provisional basis of a ten year plan.

We also get the news that since “reproductive care” was not directly funded in the bill, as a concession to those who find paying for abortion immoral, instead, a one dollar “fee” will be added to everyone’s monthly cost for obamacare, to fund “reproductive health care”, so it was kept out of the bill called obamacare that was signed into law, yet re-inserted in the bills and amendments which had to be added to finish funding what was less than funded.

I remain standing four square on the premise the leftists, the Bolsheviks, the progressives, the social democrats have not only completely infiltrated our system, but have substantially altered it by increments, such that we no longer have any real and direct control over our government if we follow the same old system of selecting our elected representatives, and we must take radical measures to restore our control of our Nation, or we must be willing to accept it gone forever, if we refuse to stand up and fight.

For three years, more has moved, more changes made that substantively alter our government, than decades of under the table dealing, and we all have had the privilege of watching the changes, while listening to the commentary of those promoting the changes.

These people, the ones who have given us our choices, would have us believe Bush was evil, Clinton was good, after all he left a balanced budget for Bush, according to their history, Bush senior was evil, and Reagan was part good and part evil.  They take this last stance only because Reagan still holds the hearts of many, and they would label him evil, but don’t want to alienate “swing voters”.

What none will state is all of these, even President Reagan, have helped the U.N. move the world closer to the day they would be the basis for a world government.

As long as America remains an Armed People, as long as we legally retain our Constitution, our titular “form” of government, and our National Creed, The Declaration, our existence as a Nation destroys any possibility of a rationalizing of world government, within the natural laws and the self evident facts we founded our Nation upon.  The moment those principles;  “the government under rule of law, bound down with the chains of the Constitution”, that man is born equal, and by this, all are born with certain unalienable rights, and men form governments for the explicit purpose of securing those rights, and it is not only a right, but a moral obligation to alter or abolish such government which fails in this purpose, so that posterity can equally enjoy rights won once, and not needing to be lost and won again, the moment that is removed from this world, the last moral standard which rationally and logically denies any possible legitimate world government has been put out the back door, and nothing stands before the U.N. which cannot be overcome by force.

Do we not have a moral obligation to those who fought and died so we could have what we have all enjoyed to various degrees, to do exactly the same for our own posterity, and those before us had, to ensure we, their posterity, received what they paid for?  Do we not have the moral obligation to our posterity, as our founders considered their duty?

If we don’t believe in “rights”, if we don’t believe that government should be bound under the rule of law, if we don’t believe government to be a construct of men for the purpose of securing rights, and not only doing so, but in so doing, brings with it a moral obligation to those who have benefited from such form and function, to maintain it for the benefit of posterity, we can easily be said not to be deserving of rights, secured, we don’t deserve to have choice in establishing and maintaining government, but saying this not only confers subjugation on a generation unwilling to fight for its rights, but on future, innocent generations, and if we have no care for our descendents can we call ourselves a “civil society?”

 

copyright March 2012 by Gulf1

Moving Our Nation Forward

by Gunnery Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired

As I look at the facts coming out of the republican party primaries, it is apparent, as a fact, we, as A Nation, have chosen to follow the well trodden path, the one we are accustomed to, and we are not going to try any “Hail Mary’s”, in an attempt to get our Nation straightened out.

I have little doubt most Americans know our country is in horrible straits, we all know that a loaf of bread has doubled in price in three years.  Every one of us looks at the fuel prices every time we pass a gas station, knowing it is not unlikely to see a different base price advertised each day, or even a difference between what was seen in the morning, going to work, and in the evening, coming home.

We have all watched three years of no budget but simply the statement “partisan politics and refusal to compromise has prevented us from producing a budget”.  No one has said what has been proffered up for compromise, and refused, because what has been proffered is total capitulation to the progressive plan.  Compromise implies willingness for both sides to make concessions, and find middle ground.  We have not been told what won’t be agreed to, because it is the total capitulation of all the underlying principles upon which this Nation was established.

We are not “slightly in debt”, as we were at the end of our war of Independence, when we owed ten times or more than the Gross National Product.  That was “slightly” because as a brand new Nation, just founded, we hadn’t begun to be productive, so we were like a teenager, just entering high school, and had only begun to do the kind of work, in the way Heads of Households do, and had barely started.

We are now a nation which should rightly be in its middle age, and at its most productive, and most secure state as to principles, our means and manners of productivity, coupled with our principles regarding our moral responsibilities about what we do, and how it affects the world we are a part of , and full of a people, both willing and able to sit together in conference and discuss with equanimity, real problems, and real solutions, without letting our petty differences in opinion, lead us off track of logic, reason, and rational use of ideas for solutions.

Instead, as conservatives, we have allowed our principles be tossed in the same pot as personal desires, personal goals and the natural drive for power.  Any principles supported by history or experience, held by roughly half The People believing in, and standing on such founding principles, have the other half literally laughing off the very idea such principles exist, far less are fixed, eternal, and necessary. The progressive way is not equal to this, but substantially more rational, because of the passage of time, and no other reason.

Anyone with the ability to learn and know history knows that man today is the same as he was a century ago, ten centuries ago, or fifty centuries ago.  Man has not grown new organs changing his means or his manner, no new parts of the brain have come into being, because man has taken the wisdom of old, added his own insight, and improved his work by an increment.  The entire notion “our principles are obsolete” for any reason is ridiculous, if one looks at the basic manner of people, what people did a hundred years ago, in the face of something, or a thousand, or all the way back to man’s first writings.  We know man remains of the same general manner, fighting wars for the same causes, killing neighbor for the same old reasons, and the fact we now use guns far more often than swords only speaks to the obsolescence of swords, confirming exactly that man remains the same, and in that, principles must also remain fixed and unchanging, to be rational.

When I see this, and I look at the numbers which represent what Americans all over the Nation are choosing to do in the coming election, I am left to ask, since it won’t be now, when will it be?  If we are to go forward, those who consider themselves conservatives, the exact same way we went “forward” in 2008, and the previous elections of the past few decades, what are we going to do different, to have a different outcome?

We go into this election with an unprecedented level of debt, with vast numbers of illegal actions by a president who by all the facts presented, is an illegal alien.  He has shown himself to be the antithesis of a law abiding, executor of the law, and a self-anointed ruler of the Nation, easily ignoring his duties, and doing according to his own will.

The entire actions of this government since this man was made president have been of the same means, defying the law, because he wants what he wants, and using an offset, just any old one which has a grain of logic in it, and then suggested this not just ameliorates the crime, but eliminates it, because the “offset” eliminates the clash of principle.

The fact is, nothing eliminates the “clash of principle versus personal desire”, because principle is right because it is from above Man’s power to control, and exists before and without man, and for man to follow the Truth, he must concede to principle, and everything otherwise is denying principle, and thus denying the truth.

In choosing to go forward without taking drastic measures, we have assured ourselves, we can’t make drastic changes, and we can at best, make only such incremental changes as are allowed by the “compromise principle” long established as our current means of congress.  Without restoring our goal to “principle”, we have accepted our Nation continuing absent such, and we have chosen to let the Progressive plan be fulfilled, by our absence of determination to stop it.  In doing so, we have said without words, we accept the terms you dictate to us.

Were it possible to do so, to actually restore our principles without changing what has been done to both our belief system and to our means of governing, we would never have faced this singular choice, nor would have faced it continuously, since before my birth, in 1957.  Again, “not to decide is to decide” is the principle which we choose as our means of confronting that which we despise.

A Nation of Principle or of mere Convenience

by Gunnery Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired

After the past election, with new members of Congress having been seated, members definitively "The People's Choice", both with regard to individuals, and in the tenor of our Society in the face of an anti-American regime gone wild.  With this election we face, we can either ratify the ways Congress returned to and the executive remained resolute in, despite the tenor of that election, or we can begin to return our Nation to its rightful founding’s, and thereby its rightful place in this world.

Our Nation is one of two Nations in history to be founded on the words and principles of the God of Abraham, Moses, Isaac and David, and these principles have long proven out true and worthy as a solid foundation for honorable society.

Our Nation was founded after years of war, which had followed decades of advocating the law be applied, and it was exactly natural that an absolute focus was put on this aspect of constituting a government, determined that the new form was not to fall to the same violations as previous, and great care was taken to protect rights against government, in its establishing.
 
As our Nation became accustomed to the security we enforced, and realized the prosperity which goes with a free market and hard working people, we tended to find our own work demanding and it easy to accept the professional politician.  Once this happened, the government being only as responsive as The People demand, in a short time, little is done for any purpose other than securing their position.  At this point every choice made must be a compromise, and most choices are made with specific regard to unintended consequences of previous compromise.

If this Nation is to survive, we must make a major change, we have to take note we are broke as a Nation, our government is broken, and not functioning at all by the law, the best interests of The People, who are the Nation are the least thing considered in any and all choices, no different than the clown with the plates on stage, spinning them on sticks..

This is not true because I say so, but because of the depth of our debt, enormous size of our central government.  It is true because we are not capable of being as productive today as we were twenty years ago, and we would have to suspend and change vast parts of government to allow ourselves just that little change.

Pointing fingers won’t change anything, but continuing on the same path will ensure we get the chance to watch our collapse.  If we wish to go forward, we have to change from what we have become, and since no other form has ever been as effective anywhere, at any time in history as our own beginning, I suggest it only makes sense to start back there, and use this Constitution which hasn’t been used much at all by much of anyone for a century.

If we look back and serious consider when and what changed, we will find it was when we got comfortable with less than fixed and absolute standards, when compromise could be with evil, as long as it was only very little evil, and this is no more or less than simply breaking with fixed and unchanging principle.

The Constitution is not a hard read, or even a long one.  By its nature, it must be brief, it was intended to constitute a government which would not be able to violate our rights.  The purpose of it was to restrain the ability of government to impose and expand unrestricted, to provide a precise form with exact laws controlling every aspect of it.  There was never an intent for the federal government “to rule the Nation”, but only to represent the Nation, in foreign affairs, and provide for the States to come together and work mutually with each other, and form a common front to the rest of the world.

If this election is to make a real difference, change the direction we are heading as a society and as a Nation, we have to recognize we cannot do this November, like we have done so often, but we have to make all our choices in election count for the same purpose and goal.  If we are to continue forward, and not become a subject Nation under world government, we have to decide to get off this train here right now, take a hard look at where our Nation stands, and start considering doing something drastic.

The whole world has been on this train for over a century, and every nation is feeling the same problems.  Who ever gets off this broken ride first has the most time to fix their economy, re-establish law over government, have the time to seriously consider the big picture, and once again, actually plan, and do so from a clean slate.  The last nation to take action will end up at the bottom of a heap.

 

Copyright March 2012, by Gulf1.