by Gunnery Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired
Much as I hate to address this issue again, the circumstances of late have brought out the left, with loud haranguing about how this has been thoroughly hashed out, it’s a waste of time, and far more than “the least” was done to close this subject for good, long ago.
As a private citizen, a life-long constitutional scholar, I simply don't see any way this man can legally be in the office he is filling, except by completely ignoring the Constitution. Legal definitions of terms are maintained as separate from general language for the same reason Latin was chosen to be used by science. As a "dead language" the words can be used to describe something exactly, and once that word or words has been applied, that is the meaning from that time on, unless there was an error in understanding, in which case a scientific change of meaning is made by the consent and with the knowledge of all in science.
The founders, in some of their many writings expounding on the whole of the Constitution, stated specifically every word and phrase is to be taken in its plain meaning when it was written, and to be read in the same spirit in which it was penned.
The judges have suggested essentially no one as a citizen has any standing at all to question his assertion regarding his status, deliberately violating their oaths, in the process, and flat out lying in suggesting there is no impact on anyone in this issue. As “sovereign citizens” it is solely our consent to be governed which provides the authority of the government and they are part of it.
On the other hand, it should be obvious each and every citizen has been directly impacted by this issue, because each of our individual issues of consent to be governed is challenged when we all are denied the evidence he meets the standard required by the Constitution. The Constitution is a contract between "The People of The Several States" of our Union, and only between "The Sovereign Citizens".
By no means is the government a party to the contract, it is the subject of the contract, and defined by that contract. There is no suggestion anywhere in the Constitution the government may speak for itself and ignoring these facts violates the idea of “a free and independent people” the founders stated was their intention for our Nation.
At this point, every act which has been taken to ascertain this man’s origins, his history, his background, the same as we expect to see with every other politician to varying degrees, has been rebuffed, those asking rebuked for doing so. There has not been a moment of time since his announced intentions that the evidence demonstrating his lack of qualification has not grown stronger.
He does not have two Americans as parents, and that is exactly what he signed on as cosponsor in the Senate bill demanding provenance on Senator McCain, and that phrase was used to define McCain’s qualifications when then Senator obama signed the second time, along with 98 other senators, making the whole of the senate, approving.
He is now known to have a fraudulent draft registration, it has been judged by document experts, forged, and the selective service bureau has just altered its rules to allow for their records of that time be destroyed, while refusing to respond to a lawful request by a law enforcement officer, pursuant to his duty, which the law requires.
He has an anomalous Social Security number the reason for which will not be released to anyone including Sheriff Arpaio, to this point, again, breaking the rule of law. At the point when this can well go on for two or three more pages, with true and pertinent data completely ignored by the media. When it all is denied as meaning anything by a government which answers to none of us, at this point, every honest American ought to step forward and demand an accounting at least as demanding as what each of us faces at every dealing with a government extended privilege, such as driving a car, entering the Armed Forces, even becoming a fireman or a police officer.
The bottom line is pretty simple, really: if he is who he says he is, then he has the papers to prove it, yet has not. If he can qualify within the definition of the Constitution, let it be demonstrated, before the whole world. If he is not what he appears to be, then why does all the evidence available show him to be a British subject, who became an Indonesian Citizen by virtue of adoption, and returned with his mother to this country with no record showing how he entered..
How he gets from “Indonesian Citizen” as is known, to being an American citizen has yet to be shown. The INS microfilm mysteriously is missing the entire week during which he returned, and only this week. There is no record of his becoming a citizen at all, and there is record of his becoming an Indonesian citizen.
Just exactly how is he even an American? I stand on the fact we have an illegal alien in our president’s office, and he has been installed there for deliberate purpose, he called it “change you can believe in”.
Copyright May 2012 by Gulf1